stoneberg logo

Bert Stoneberg, Ph.D.
K-12 Research Idaho

Home Page

ARCHIVE (PDF Documents List)
--> Refresh screen for possible updates.

1-10   11-20   21-30   31-40   41-50

  1. NAEP Proficient vs. NAEP Proficiency in Subject (PDF)
  2. The “Link” Between Education Spending and Student Performance: A Twisted Link (PDF)
  3. NAEP vs. ISAT Trends for Reading and Mathematics: Grades 4 and 8, 2003 to 2011 (PDF)
  4. Rigor of State Proficiency Standards vs. Overall Student Achievement, NAEP 2009 (PDF)
  5. Idaho Student Achievement and State Education Spending, 2000-2013 (PDF)
  6. NAEP Reading and Mathematics 2003-2013: Idaho vs. the Other States (PDF)
  7. Does NAEP  Support an Expectation that Implementing Tiered Licensing Leads to Higher Achievement? No! (PDF)
  8. How Idaho 8th Graders Compared to International 8th Graders on TIMSS 2011 (PDF)
  9. National Assessment Governing Board (NAEP) Does Not Set “National Goals for Education” (PDF)
  10. School Improvement Surveys for K-12 Students, Parents and Staff  [HTML]
  1. Idaho's NAEP Results for 2013; Grades 4, 8 and 12 [HTML]
  2. NAEP Achievement Levels: Interpret and Use with Caution  (PDF)
  3. ISAT/SBAC Field Test 2014 vs. NAEP 2013: Achievement Level Scores (PDF)
  4. SAT Scores Are Statistically Unsuitable For Cross-State Comparisons (PDF)
  5. TIMSS 2011 Advanced Benchmarks: United States vs. Other Education Systems, Grades 4 and 8 (PDF)
  6. Mapping Study 2013: State Proficiency Standards vs. Student Achievement (PDF)
  7. What Percent Proficient or Advanced Means in the New ISAT (PDF)
  8. Scale Score to Percentile Rank Conversion Tables for the 2015 Idaho Standards Achievement Tests (PDF)
  9. The relationship between the rigor of a state's proficiency standard and student achievement in the state. (ERIC)
  10. Idaho's NAEP Results for 2015: Grades 4, 8 and 12 [HTML]
  1. Achievement Level Results Can Contradict Scale Score Results: An Example from NAEP (16-001)
  2. Idaho's ISAT/SBAC Grade 10 Graduation Requirement Is Unreasonable (16-002)
  3. Scale Scores Are Needed to Understand Achievement Test Results (16-003)
  4. Idaho vs. Other “Poor States” and the Nation in Per-Pupil Spending, FY 2013 (16-004)
  5. Scale Score to Percentile Rank Conversion Tables for the 2016 Idaho Standards Achievement Tests (ISAT)  (PDF)
  6. Idaho's ISAT percentile results,  2015-2016 (PDF)
  7. "Percentle Calculator" for district, school or classroom ISAT/SBAC percentile results
  8. The IRI and the Idaho Reading Initiative, 2016  (PDF)
  9. Biology and Chemistry Achievement in Idaho High Schools, 2015 and 2016 (PDF)
  10. Albertson Foundation Survey 2017 - Brief Comments (PowerPoint)
  1. SBAC/ISAT “percent proficient vs. percentiles” gives different pictures of student achievement (PDF)
  2. <new>   Scale Score to Percentile Rank Conversion Tables for the 2017 Idaho Standards Achievement Tests (ISAT)  (PDF)
  3. Idaho's ISAT percentile results, 2015-2017 (PDF)
  4. <new>   Biology and Chemistry Achievement in Idaho High Schools, 2015-2017  (PDF)
  5. <new>  Average Score contradicts Percent At/Above Proficient on state vs. national  comparisons: Examples, 2015 grade 8 mathematics (PDF)
  6. z
  7. z
  8. z
  9. z
  10. Idaho's NAEP Results for 2017: Grades 4 and 8 [HTML]

Disclosure:  K-12 Research Idaho is a Personal Public Service Project funded entirely from retirement benefits.
Bert Stoneberg was NAEP State Coordinator for Idaho from 2002 to 2012.

Top of Page - © Bert D. Stoneberg

Go to:  Home Page